Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature: Add PepXMLReader #54

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023
Merged

Feature: Add PepXMLReader #54

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 20, 2023

Conversation

RalfG
Copy link
Member

@RalfG RalfG commented Oct 20, 2023

Added

  • io: Added new io.pepxml reader

Fixed

  • Docs: Add ionbot to README.rst, fix order in API docs

@RalfG RalfG added the enhancement Improvement of an existing feature label Oct 20, 2023
@RalfG RalfG added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Oct 20, 2023
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: 20 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (ee39fd2) 58.26% compared to head (0aa5990) 58.49%.

❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #54      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.26%   58.49%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files          22       23       +1     
  Lines        2106     2159      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits         1227     1263      +36     
- Misses        879      896      +17     
Files Coverage Δ
psm_utils/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
psm_utils/io/__init__.py 36.66% <100.00%> (+0.71%) ⬆️
psm_utils/io/pepxml.py 61.53% <61.53%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RalfG RalfG merged commit f153e35 into main Oct 20, 2023
5 checks passed
@RalfG RalfG deleted the feature/pepxml branch October 20, 2023 02:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement Improvement of an existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants